Top 5 Feminist Articles About Hillary Clinton from 2015

FullSizeRender

2015 was an exciting year for Hillary Clinton fans. We cheered her on as she officially launched her candidacy, ooh-ed and ah-ed as she raised a boatload of money, and breathed heavy sighs of relief when she kicked butt during the first few Democratic debates. If the polls are right, Hillary fans are ready to see her crush the competition in the upcoming Democratic primaries, and we’re ready to root her on to win it all in November. 

As I reflect back on 2015 and Hillary’s candidacy thus far, I have much to say about the missing feminist groundswell to support her campaign. Most of my feminist friends (if such categorizations can be made) are tepidly supporting her, if that. Instead of creating fun websites, blogs, and Tumblr posts in the same vein as Notorious RBG or Feminist Ryan Gosling – feeds about what an amazing feminist Hillary is and will be as our next president – it feels like many of us women’s rights supporters have stayed pretty quiet.

In fact, I’d wager more was written about how Hillary is not feminist enough, not the right type of feminist, not connecting with certain women, or why feminists should support Bernie Sanders than a) why feminists are excited to support Hillary and b) any feminist analyses of relevant campaign issues (e.g. sexism, sexism, and also, sexism). More on this soon.

Despite all this, I did read a handful of very compelling pieces about Hillary and feminism in 2015. So, while there weren’t oodles of them to choose, I’ve compiled a list of my top 5 feminist articles about Hillary Clinton from 2015 here:

1. Lena Dunham interviews Hillary Clinton
In the kickoff edition of Lenny http://www.lennyletter.com/, Lena Dunham and Jenni Konner’s interesting newsletter that covers feminism and politics among other topics, Dunham interviews Hillary. Here, twenty-something Dunham asks Hillary the “question on every Lenny reader’s lips: Do you consider yourself a feminist?”, allowing Hillz to answer forcefully: absolutely.

The Lenny Interview: Hillary Clinton

2. Feministing blogger Dana Bolger takes on the “Millennials hate Hillary” trope
I love Feministing, and Dana Bolger offers a great example of why it’s such a great feminist blog with her post ripping the Sunday New York Times’ “think piece” on what Bolger calls the “feminist generation war.” Bolger rightly characterizes this war—and the idea perpetuated by these types of articles that older women “get” feminism and thus support Hillary, while younger women just aren’t that smart and therefore don’t support her—as dangerous.

Dear New York Times: The Real Reason Young Feminists Reject Hillary

3. Michelle Goldberg shares her experiences as a Hillary supporter among Bernie fans
I want to pin Michelle Goldberg’s line that Bernie Sanders’ campaign has “unleashed a minor plague of progressive white men confidently explaining feminism to the rest of us” on my wall for the next time I have a conversation with someone about why supporting Hillary isn’t what feminism is about. Myokay dokay.

Men Explain Hillary to Me

4. Suzanna Danuta Walters lays out her case for supporting Hillary
The Nation is such a progressive, left-leaning publication that Suzanna Danuta Walters’ piece about why she’s supporting Hillary could actually be considered provoking in itself. Walters lays out her case for why Hillary in the White House would benefit the women’s equality movement, from policy to politics to needed culture shifts.

Why This Socialist Feminist Is for Hillary

5. Sady Doyle takes on the misogynist attacks against Hillary Clinton and questions why liking her is a subversive act
In this thought-provoking piece, Sady Doyle tackles Hillary’s “likeability” issues, telling us that liking Hillary has become a subversive act. Doyle also asks her readers how long they would make it if people treated them the way many treat Hillary. I couldn’t agree with Doyle more that it’s not fair that Hillary must “climb over a barbed-wire fence of hatred in order to change the world.”

More Than Likable Enough

So, dear readers, those are my top 5. Are there others I missed? Send them my way! And because writing it on the interwebs makes it true, in addition to building my upper body strength and meditating more, my New Years’ resolution is to help grow this list in 2016.

Connectedness, Digilantism, and Trauma

Trigger warning: rape has been in the news a lot over the past few weeks and it’s made me mad and sad, so I’m going to write about it as the main topic of my post today.

I almost threw up watching coverage of the kidnappings in Cleveland and the details emerge of what those three women endured for the last decade. Then news broke that military sexual assaults had increased 30 percent in the past two years… which was overshadowed by the story of the Air Force guy in charge of a sexual assault program being charged with abuse himself. And yesterday, reports circulated that an Army guy tasked with sexual assault prevention is now under investigation for sexual assault and pimping. Pimping.

All this rape news—the articles on the internet, NPR reports, the constant conversations on cable news—stirred a great deal of ongoing angst and discomfort. And it got me thinking about how our 24-hour reporting cycle and the explosion in internet access is changing the way we handle, report, and even think about sexual assault.

Of late, I’ve been very interested in the practice of “cybervigalantism” or “digilantism” as it relates to issues around sexual abuse. These terms are being used to define vigilantism against crimes via the web—often involving folks who take to internet sleuthing themselves when they feel law enforcement has failed to work a case adequately.

Two quick examples: Rehtaeh Parsons, a Canadian teenager, was raped and cyberbullied, and police dropped the case. When she killed herself, a group called Anonymous (which is most known for hacking) began advocating for justice on her behalf and even publicly communicated directly to Rehtaeh’s alleged rapists. In a separate and highly publicized case in Steubenville, Ohio, teenage rapists actually documented their assault and bragged about it online. The NY Times published an interesting piece about how bloggers helped support the survivor when law enforcement (and many in the small town) seemed disinclined to fully investigate and prosecute the case.

If, as the career counselors tell us, anything you put online stays with you for the rest of your life, how do these infinite histories affect wrong doing and even the act of crime itself? I want to believe that the threat of a lifelong, criminal record online would be enough to dissuade anyone from engaging in nonconsensual sex, but that’s naïve. Instead, I feel disheartened—particularly in these two cases—that law enforcement was so far behind in their embrace of social media. Instead of a preventative force, it feels like the online world maintains a patriarchal status quo.

It reminds me of the staggeringly horrendous statistics around the FBI’s investigation of known child pornographers. Last I checked, we were in single digits—like, we know these guys are out there because we can see them committing the criminal act of sharing illegal photos, but we’re putting so disgustingly few resources into stopping them (investigations are in single digits) that the practice continues basically unabated. The crime isn’t prevented, justice isn’t done, and nobody is getting a message that that shit ain’t right.

Speaking of child pornography, I recently read a compelling article about how the invincibility of online content contributes to a type of re-traumatization of child sexual assault survivors whose abuse was captured and distributed as child pornography. ThePrice of a Stolen Childhood documents this retrauma in a really poignant way, and posits a compelling question about financial retribution. It makes me wonder whether traditional organizations dedicated to aiding survivors of sexual assault have had to incorporate a social media component into conversations and trainings around post-traumatic stress for survivors. I can imagine this becoming increasingly troublesome (and important) as access to technology and connectedness increases.

And I think we can all agree that it will only increase—changing the way we live. Already, law enforcement can use your cell phone GPS data to track your location and figure out whether you were at a crime scene or not at a particular moment—no warrant necessary. Post-Boston, it seems like cameras on any and every city street are to be expected. Although many still think of sexual assault is a “private” or “personal” crime, these violent acts are being committed in a world that is increasingly connected and online, where lines of privacy are unclear and shifting.

When it comes down to it, we’re talking about people’s lives, well-being, and safety. As we question our ever-connected world, the realities of sexual assault and efforts to end the epidemic are a relevant piece of that discussion.

Note: this post was first published on fortysevenseventyeight.wordpress.com.

Pass the Troll Doll

Sometimes my current work life feels like a strange alternate universe to my feminism-focused past. I still work on women and gender issues, but because of where I’m doing the work these days, I’m almost completely surrounded by younger white dudes. That’s right. I work with a few women, but the vast majority of my closest colleagues are young men in their twenties. If you’d told me a decade ago that after working at six different women’s organizations and taking on two advanced degrees in women’s issues, I’d find myself loving an office full of young dudes… well, I would’ve laughed in your face. But here I am…

The most pleasant surprise about this dude-heavy environment is the growing role humor plays in my workday. Look elsewhere for a post comparing men and women’s senses of humor. Of course I laughed with fellow feminists working at women’s organizations. And I’m lucky to celebrate deep friendships with incredibly funny women. And men—most of my coworkers included—make great feminists. Funny ones, even.

But I have come to respect my guy coworkers’ senses of humor in a way that has distinguished this experience from past funny times. Perhaps because of how well we know each other via time spent, and how unprofessional political environments can be, my office culture is incredibly familiar. We all know everyone’s strengths and weaknesses and we’ve all tripped over our personal landmines through conversations where nothing is off limits. For the guys I work with, our office culture involves a lot of joking—often, they put each other down or “burn” each other through witty remarks meant to hit at the underbelly—extra points for wit, never points for only meanness.

We’ve also evolved a sort of collective game out of “trolling” each other. My best guess is that the term trolling comes from Internet comments sections—like an online version of fly fishing, where people post inflammatory comments to see if they can make the opposition bite—riling them into losing their cool and acting crazy. Urban Dictionary provides a pretty solid definition:

The art of deliberately, cleverly, and secretly pissing people off, usually via the internet, using dialogue. Trolling does not mean just making rude remarks: Shouting swear words at someone doesn’t count as trolling; it’s just flaming, and isn’t funny. Spam isn’t trolling either; it pisses people off, but it’s lame.

The most essential part of trolling is convincing your victim that either a) truly believe in what you are saying, no matter how outrageous, or b) give your victim malicious instructions, under the guise of help.

In the context of my workplace, trollers need to know their victims and their soft spots—what will set them off. For example, my coworkers are not blind to the fact that I’m passionate about women’s issues and regularly loudly outspoken about sexist themes (fun for them, no?). Successful trolls of me have included:

Me: “I just saw a sign in the Capitol building that said ‘men at work’ – how ridiculously sexist is that! It’s 2013—where’s the ‘people at work’ sign? I’m calling to report this.”

Coworker: “Well, it kind of makes sense because all of the ‘women at work’ signs are in the kitchen.”

Me: “You know, typing can really hurt your hands.”

Coworker: “Yeah, I don’t know how you women do it all day.”

After each troll lobbed with a deadpanned tone, everyone looks to gauge a reaction and assess if the humor attempt was successful. True to definition, the best gotchas happen when you can’t quite figure out if your coworker really just turned into a despicable asshole. But that’s the definition of a good troll—and in my office, when it’s done right, we pass over a little troll doll (like this guy) as a temporary trophy for the quick wit and good collective laugh… until the next troll hits.

I think the reason this type of humor works for me in an essentially all-male environment is that the trolls have become very celebrated opportunities for my coworkers to show they understand larger issues of oppression, sexism, and homophobia. In order to troll me well, they can’t just make a “feminazi” reference and call it a day. Rather, the focus has to be on an issue, the joke has to be relatively smart, and the delivery has to be believable.

Thankfully, my younger dude coworkers do engage in intellectual conversations about feminist topics, though typically I’m initiating and managing these discussions. In a sense, our trolling culture is a way for these guys to acknowledge these issues themselves. They’re definitely not shimmying up to my desk to ask how I understand white male privilege at work in the current media coverage of Hillary Clinton’s possible 2016 presidential bid. But an effective troll can capture the essence of this issue with clarity and wit. Better still, these young men are initiating this thought process themselves and relying on a collective feminist lens in order for the troll to make sense to everyone—and thus succeed at being funny.

As in life, lines and wires are sometimes crossed. But for the most part, I’ve been deeply appreciative of this incredibly collegial environment where I am a lone lady. I’ve got to say, it’s funny to me that I’ve helped create a custom of rewarding young guys for making the wittiest joke about sexism by saying something completely sexist to my face. But I say, pass the troll doll.

Note: this post was first published on fortysevenseventyeight.wordpress.com.

Bachelor Feminism?

One of the weirder things about being so progressively feminist is how much I love The Bachelor. For the under-initiated, this is a first generation (now in its 17th season) reality TV show on ABC that features a hunky Bachelor trying to decide between 25 hand-picked, lovely young women who incredibly all fall in love with The Bachelor on the first night of the show. There are old-fashioned dates, lots of gratuitous makeouts with basically every contestant, and a ceremony featuring roses at the end of each show that confirms it’s all as white and heteronormative as TV gets.

If I’m being honest, The Bachelor isn’t the only trash media I intake on a fairly regular basis. I love almost every rom com ever created. This reverence is seconded only by my extensive adoration of Sex and the City now that it’s on daily reruns on cable TV. I can practically quote entire shows at this point. And the made-for-TV program I’ve watched most of in my life is none other than BBC’s Pride and Prejudice—5.5 hours of Jane Austin goodness (note to my Curmudgeon co-blogger: I guess a girl can like profanity and Jane at the same time).

If I were a well-rounded media consumer, I probably wouldn’t give this debasing dalliance a second thought. As it goes, I rarely watch TV and spend too many of my internet hours reading tumblr feeds (and tumblr feeds and tumblr feeds and tumblr feeds), revisiting my Bachelor fascination, or scouting out weird Mormon DIY blogs. It’s the furthest I could possibly get from BBC news or reading about indigenous women undergarment knitters.

A friend has a theory he calls “nostalgic escapism” – a way to label the longing for a place you used to live and the incessant imagining that life would somehow be better, even now, if you were there rather than here. You know, escaping to something or someone you used to love, even if that love was only realized once you left… and may or may not be as fantastic as you imagine if you really did go back.

It isn’t any great thought to posit that the media we consume is a form of escape. I spend a lot of time during the day thinking about a lot of bad things, seeing a lot of bad things, and trying to fix a world that at times feels completely backward. When I’m on recess—whether a five minute interwebs break or an hour on the couch after work—the last thing I want to do is review more bad things with Mr. MacNeil or Mr. Lehrer. Why, when I can watch a hunky guy fall in love with 25 lovely women all at once? I guess that’s why most Americans get their news from Colbert and the Daily Show and weird cat videos are the most watched thing on YouTube—we all need an escape.

What I’d like to unpack a bit more is why I want to escape to something that I have no nostalgia for—and are shows, no less, that feature relationships and power dynamics I denigrate during real life. Even my non-feminist lady friends (writing these words reminds me of another post for another time) think The Bachelor is trash and don’t understand the appeal of Carrie Bradshaw. I guess they watch cool shows like Modern Family.

Let’s skip any dime store psychology that says, deep down, I really do want to play out the archaic, creepy scenes I love watching to unwind. Or maybe that I’ve overcomplicated relationships in my own life so much that textbook gender roles take my mind off of this self-made quagmire.

Neither answer works for me. Instead, I think it has more to do with Feminist Ryan Gosling. Have you seen this one yet? Images of cutey Ryan G. overlaid with feminist quotes like “if I had a hammer, I’d smash the patriarch,” complete with a catchy “hey girl” meme. Feminist Ryan Gosling serves as a good reminder that life rolls out in shades of color. It says, “hey girl, it’s okay to like the things you like, even if the combination seems a little unintuitive or even contradictory.” Just like you can learn important feminist lessons while enjoying a laugh at the oddness of the internet, you can get your daily news from Jon Stewart and still have important ideas about the world. Or be a good feminist (!) and have fun with the paradoxes involved in watching trashy reality TV.

I’ll leave you with this: the concept of nostalgic escapism, at least in the sense of how we consume media, isn’t really applicable. Even if you try to escape, the content trudges ahead. I’m not saying reality TV is a progressive’s dream, but it’s no longer 90’s—we’ve come a long way from Pedro Zamora breaking all sorts of barriers. Nowadays, you’re hiding from real news and Samantha Bee nails it on military brohesion. Try to find that kind of smarts on any local news show. As RyGo might say, hey girl, we can’t ever go back, but let’s move forward together.

Note: this post was first published on fortysevenseventyeight.wordpress.com.

Prioritize the Gap

Much has been made in the past week or so of claims that our President has fallen prey to a bit of gender and racial bias in staffing his inner circles. In case you missed it, this photo in the NY Times prompted a wave of news items and opinion pieces about whether Obama prefers to employ white dudes rather than living out the dream of a diverse and equal America he promoted relentlessly on the campaign trail.

I cheered on Dowd for calling out the hypocrisy of Democrats smugly condemning Republican “binders of women” when the Democratic Party is clearly not enjoying any post-feminist sunset. I also appreciated this update of an earlier study of professional women in Washington D.C. revealing how the “old boys club” is still in full swing in this town—if you ask women. Here’s one that squarely blames Obama for ignoring the “optics” of his woman problem because he’s got the policies right. And finally, one of my favorite blogs, Feministing.com, published a simple but straightforward post on Obama’s gender/race gap. That piece concludes:

Yes, there are too many white men in the White House, but there are too many white men everywhere you turn in politics.

Well said. Obama’s thoughtlessness about these decisions reveals what every woman working in politics and policy knows: it’s 2013 and still a man’s world. Women represent 18% of the House and 20% of the Senate.  We’re 3% of Fortune 500 CEOs. We hold 20% of top positions across business, law, academia, and journalism. But we make up more than half the workforce and are better educated than men (more BAs, more MAs, and almost as many MBAs and law degrees). Despite this, qualified women aren’t getting equal pay, or the shot at promotions—including in Obama’s White House.

I believe this is what must change before anything else in American politics shifts. As progressives, we’re working with hope toward change for a wide swath of issues we all care about—education, poverty, violence, the environment, choice, etc. But if we realistically hope to change anything, we’re going to need to address the fact that our political system is filled with white dudes and that unless our government becomes more representative of America, it will continue churning out status quo policies (and hiring practices).

A couple of things. I like white dudes. There exist some really awesome white dudes. American white guys, even. But the knapsack of white privilege and patriarchy fits really comfortably and doesn’t require much critical thought from those who wear it. It’s not like I believe there’s a secret class in high school that all the white guys get pulled out of class for—like some racial/masculinity indoctrination curriculum where they don the knapsack and learn about pay inequity and beer commercials. That’s crazy.

Power is definitely a complicated concept, and you could spend decades thinking through Foucault, Gramsci, MacKinnon, and what many others have written about it. But I think we can agree that it’s generally something that doesn’t get transferred (to run with a loose concept) without a fight. Just ask any redistricting commission across the country.  Or elementary school kids playing with Legos. But nor is power something that is easily identified by the masses themselves.

So yes, we cut Obama too much slack on parity/equality issues within his administration because he’s a black man breaking a glass ceiling himself. But we’re also cutting him slack because we don’t see women and minority under-representation in American politics as a problem. Men don’t see it as a problem and women don’t see it as a problem. It’s the status quo and it’s the reality in our country—just like gun violence, crappy schools, smog-filled air, and institutionalized poverty. But unlike these other issues, under-representation is not something that progressives or feminists have honestly admitted is holding us back as a democracy.

To me, our first priority should be clearly seeing the gender and racial gap in American politics and committing ourselves to changing it.

Note: this post was first published on fortysevenseventyeight.wordpress.com.